Posted by: kathyhugs | April 15, 2009

Decision by the Judge

Here is the latest. At this point I am glad that the Judge made this decision but at the same time I am tired of the waiting and all of the legal stuff. Sometimes I think that it never ends but that is tonight. Tomorrow I will have had a chance to talk to God and get over my case of the blahs and blues. That sounds like a great name for a song! Anyway, as you can read below there are several status hearings and phone conferences scheduled. In the end we just wait to see when and if the trials happen. Your prayers are always welcome and I know that some days they are the only thing that helps me to get over the blahs!! Thank you!

Weapons will remain in evidence in Amato trial

LISBON – Weapons evidence which resulted in additional charges against murder defendant Jack (J.C.) Amato Jr. will remain in evidence after a judge found no problem with a search warrant issued last September.
Judge Joseph Bruzzese Jr. issued his decision Monday afternoon, overruling a motion filed by Amato’s defense team to challenge the legality of the search warrant and demand the resulting evidence be tossed.
He found that probable cause existed for the warrant to be issued as is, despite arguments by defense attorney James Hartford that law enforcement officials “deliberately deceived” Columbiana County Common Pleas Court Judge C. Ashley Pike into issuing the search warrant by including incorrect information and leaving out other information known at the time.
“The court further finds that to the extent that actual facts varied from those set forth in the affidavit that the variances were slight, inconsequential and unintentional,” Bruzzese wrote in the eight-page decision.
A Common Pleas Court judge in Jefferson County, Bruzzese was appointed to handle the search warrant motion since Pike issued the warrant which came under fire. Pike is handling both the murder case and the weapons case against Amato.
Amato, 37, was charged last year with murder and having weapons under disability in the shooting death of his wife, Tonia, at their Wellsville residence on July 1, 2007. He claimed self-defense, saying she fired a gun at him first after an argument and then he shot her with a .45-caliber handgun.
He had been released from jail after his father posted bond and had been confined under electronic monitoring at his father’s Irondale home awaiting trial. During a search of the Irondale residence on Sept. 17 for a gun involved in the shooting, investigators found guns and an alleged pipe bomb in Amato’s room, leading to an additional five counts of having weapons under disability and one count of possession of a dangerous ordnance, all felonies. As a defendant in a felony case, he was prohibited from having weapons.
He remains jailed under the bond for the weapons case, which remains set for trial on May 19, with a status hearing set for 11:30 a.m. May 11. The murder trial remains scheduled for Aug. 18, with a status hearing at 9 a.m. Aug. 10 and a telephone conference set for 8:45 a.m. Friday. The prosecution in both cases is being handled by Special Prosecutor Lynn Grimshaw, who was appointed when county Prosecutor Robert Herron recused himself due to a conflict.
In his ruling, Bruzzese addressed various arguments raised by the defense, including the fact that Detective Lt. Andy Sweeney of the county Sheriff’s Office concluded the bullet containing the victim’s DNA was the bullet that killed her, even though the coroner’s office didn’t make any conclusion. The reason for the search was to find a .45-caliber gun to match the bullet after investigators determined the gun they had didn’t match what they concluded was the fatal bullet.
“An examination of the affidavit alone reveals sufficient true facts from which any judge could have and would have concluded the bullet in question was probably the fatal bullet,” he wrote.
He also ruled that information left out of the search warrant would not have made a difference in the finding of probable cause to allow the search, concluding the evidence that the bullet was found in line with the defendant’s position at the time of the incident and the victim’s location actually strengthened the argument for probable cause.
The argument that the search should have been limited to a “competition” .45-caliber weapon also failed, because the search would have turned up the same evidence whether authorities were looking for a “competition” weapon or regular weapon.
The judge wrote that testimony by a doctor from the Cuyahoga County Coroner’s Office had no effect on the probable cause. The doctor had told the defense he would have expected half the bullet’s mass to be missing when less than half was missing. His conclusion wasn’t known to Sweeney at the time of the affidavit, and the doctor testified that he didn’t know the original weight of the bullet.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. My mind is slowly at ease as I see how good Mr Grimshaw is with what he does and I have the utmost faith in him… Things are slowly looking better! It’s about time. I hope justice can be served… Also thanks for writing all this and keeping us all updated and posted!Karl


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: